| 人工智能透明性原则的制度构建:范式选择与要素分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 人工智能透明性原则的制度构建:范式选择与要素分析.人工智能透明性原则的制度构建:范式选择与要素分析[J].科学学研究,2022,40(4):611-618. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 人工智能透明性原则的制度构建:范式选择与要素分析 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 首都经济贸易大学 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “算法黑箱”背后的信息不对称或将带来社会风险,在人工智能技术发展的过程中,透明性原则的实现是算法监管、建立信赖关系的前提与基础,智能产业的发展和社会信赖利益也呼吁透明性原则的建立。但由于利益冲突、技术特征和制度成本等障碍,对人工智能技术监管不应采取传统领域彻底、全部公开的透明方式,而需确立有限、合理的透明标准。这一标准的有效落实依赖于行为规范和私权保护的协同作用,对人工智能进行事前预防、事中约束和事后救济等全过程控制,并结合对主体、客体、程度、条件等要素的场景化思考,实现智能科技创新、整体经济效益和社会公共利益之间的平衡与协调。
|
| 收稿时间： | 2020-12-04 |
Institutional construction of the transparency principle of artificial intelligence: paradigm selection and elements analysis |
| |
| Abstract: | The information asymmetry behind the "algorithm black box" will bring social risks. In the development of artificial intelligence technology, the principle of transparency is the prerequisite and basis for algorithm supervision and the establishment of trust relationships. The development of intelligent industries and social trust benefits also call for the principle of transparency. However, due to obstacles such as conflicts of interest, technical characteristics, and institutional costs, the thorough, full openness and transparency in the traditional field should not be adopted to supervise the artificial intelligence technology, but instead requiring limited and reasonable transparency standards. The effective implementation of this standard relies on the synergy of the governance of conduct and the protection of private rights, the entire process control of artificial intelligence such as pre-prevention, interim restraint, and post-relief, combined with the subject, object, degree, and conditions in contexts, in order to realize the balance and coordination between intelligent technological innovation, overall economic benefits and social public interests. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
