| 史学思潮与档案景观的变迁 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 闫静.史学思潮与档案景观的变迁[J].档案学研究,2022,36(3):141-148. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 闫静 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学历史文化学院 济南 250100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从本体意涵来看,历史与档案具有诸多共通之处,二者兼为“往事本身”与“往事记录”,共同服务于人类社会对过去的记载、追忆与缅怀。从发展历程来看,史学思潮对档案景观的变迁多有影响,二者亦有诸多契合之处,传统史学对档案文献的奉为圭臬,新史学对史料范围的延展及对档案关注点的转移,后现代史学对档案真实性的质疑及对档案范式的影响,使得历史与档案的关系进一步深化。从本体意涵和发展历程两个层面来看,档案之于历史不应犹如异乡,历史之于档案亦非渐行渐远。
|
Trends of Historical Thoughts and Changes of Archives Landscape |
| |
| Jing YAN.Trends of Historical Thoughts and Changes of Archives Landscape[J].Archives Science Study,2022,36(3):141-148. |
| |
| Authors: | Jing YAN |
| |
| Abstract: | Judging from the ontological meaning of history and archives, the two have many similarities. They are both for "the past itself" and "record of the past" and jointly serve the human community on past documentation, remembrance and cherish the memory. Judging from development process, trends of historical thought has much influence on the changes of archives landscape.In addition, there are many similarities between the two. The traditional historiography regards archival documents as criterion, new history extends the scope of historical materials and transfers the archival concerns, and postmodern historiography has questioned the authenticity of archives and its influence the archival paradigm, all these make the relationship between history and archives further deepened. From the perspective of ontological meaning and development process, the archives should not be like a foreign country to history, and the history should not be far away to archives. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《档案学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《档案学研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
