| 期刊信赖度及其评价思路 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 万东升.期刊信赖度及其评价思路[J].编辑学报,2016,28(1):3-6. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 万东升 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川理工学院学报编辑部/四川理工学院学术传播与评价研究所,643000,四川自贡 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 全国高等学校文科学报研究会编辑学研究重点课题 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文认为可从宏观层面和微观层面来进行期刊信赖度评价.在宏观层面上,主要是期刊利益相关主体对信赖度的主观感受和评价,这种评价方法是期刊利益相关主体基于某种利益考量和经验判断;而微观层面上,主要通过各种问卷调查法、文献评价法等,运用相关工具对信赖度进行比较细致的评估.不但要推动研究者重点从提高服务态度和服务质量入手而加强对期刊信赖度的研究,拓宽相关理论的广度和深度,还要深入进行期刊信赖度评价指标的探索和创新,以便更好地在编辑学研究、期刊评价和学术评价中发挥重要的作用.
|
| 关 键 词： | 期刊信赖 信赖度 期刊管理 期刊评价 学术评价 |
| 收稿时间： | 2011/3/22 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2011/3/22 0:00:00 |
Reliability of a journal and its evaluation methods |
| |
| WAN Dongsheng.Reliability of a journal and its evaluation methods[J].Acta Editologica,2016,28(1):3-6. |
| |
| Authors: | WAN Dongsheng |
| |
| Institution: | Editorial Department of the Journal/Institute of Academic Transmission and Evaluation, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, 643000, Zigong, Sichuan, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The reliability of a journal can be evaluated from the macro and micro levels. On the macro level, it is reflected in subjective feelings of involved main bodies and their evaluation on the reliability. On the micro level, reliability should be evaluated carefully through questionnaire, investigation, literature evaluationmethod, and related tools. It is suggested that scientific and social science researchers should enhance their research of journal reliability from the perspective of improving the quality and attitude of service, and expand the depth and width of relevant theories. Moreover, they should deepen the learning, innovation and exploration on journal reliability evaluation indexes to play a better function in standardization of relevant redactology, periodical evaluation and academic evaluation. |
| |
| Keywords: | trust in journal reliability journal management journal evaluation academic evaluation |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
