Oddity learning in the pigeon: Effect of negative instances,correction, and number of incorrect alternatives |
| |
| Authors: | Thomas R Zentall David E Hogan Charles A Edwards |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, 40506, Lexington, Kentucky
2. Northern Kentucky University, 41076, Highland Heights, Kentucky
|
| |
| Abstract: | Pigeons have difficulty learning a standard oddity task involving two colors and three stimulus positions. In Experiment 1, performance on standard noncorrection trials was compared with performance on (1) rerun correction trials in which errors resulted in trial repetition, (2) noncorrection trials with added “negative instance” trials involving presentation of three stimuli, all of which matched, and (3) a combination of correction and added negative instance trials. Results indicated that negative instances, but not correction trials, significantly facilitated oddity performance. In Experiment 2, Phase 1, number of stimulus positions lit (three or five) was factorially manipulated with number of positions on which the odd stimulus could appear (three or five). An increase in number of positions lit, but not number of positions that could be odd, facilitated performance. In Phase 2, birds transferred from trials with five positions lit to four positions lit performed significantly better than controls; but in Phase 3, the same birds did not perform significantly better than controls when transferred to trials with three positions lit. In both experiments, analysis of performance as a function of response position indicated better performance at the end of each display than in the middle. These results, together with the group performance differences in Experiment 2, suggest that oddity learning in pigeons involves a size, or number, discrimination. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
