| 德国与美国刑事证据排除规则衍生史及制度构型比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许乐.德国与美国刑事证据排除规则衍生史及制度构型比较研究[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(2):160-165. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许乐 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学法学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 德国证据使用禁止理论与美国非法证据排除规则作为当代世界两大法系主要法治国家在刑事证据排除规则方面的两种代表性理论,在两国的立法和司法实践方面都具有丰富的内涵并按照不同的原则形成了各自的例外。这种"原则加例外"的法律实践模式对于其他法治国家而言具有典型的"范式"意义,这种范式只有在切合各国法律传统和具体国情的基本框架内构建各自的刑事证据排除规则,才能从制度上保障刑事诉讼程序的公正高效运行。
|
| 关 键 词： | 西方法制史 证据使用禁止 非法证据排除 权衡原则 |
A Comparative Study of the Derivative History of Criminal Evidence Removal Rules and Institutional Shaping Between Germany and America |
| |
| XU Le.A Comparative Study of the Derivative History of Criminal Evidence Removal Rules and Institutional Shaping Between Germany and America[J].Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2012(2):160-165. |
| |
| Authors: | XU Le |
| |
| Institution: | XU Le (College of Law,Southwest University of Politics and Law,Chongqing 401120) |
| |
| Abstract: | German theory of evidence-utility prohibition and American rule of illegal evidence exclusion are two representative theories in criminal evidence exclusion in the major law-government states in the contemporary world.The two theories are of rich connotations and have developed respective exceptions according to different principles in the law-making and law-implementing practice of the states.This "principle-plus-exception" mode of legal practice is of significance as a "pattern" to other law-government states.The pattern cannot assure a just and effective operation of criminal proceeding institutionally unless respective rules of criminal evidence exclusion are developed in the basic framework of different legal traditions and national conditions. |
| |
| Keywords: | western legal history evidence-utility prohibition illegal evidence exclusion balancing principle |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
