| “非但”的语用信息功能考察——兼谈跟“不但”的差别 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 胡斌彬.“非但”的语用信息功能考察——兼谈跟“不但”的差别[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(4):123-130. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 胡斌彬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华侨大学文学院,福建泉州362021 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本刊匿名审稿人对本文提出了宝贵意见,谨此致谢,文中谬误,概由作者自负. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 根据信息和标记理论，当代汉语中的“非但”是一个兼具反预期信息标示功能和反预期递进信息预示功能的标记词，其作用主要在于既标示先行句的反预期信息，又预示后续句的反预期递进信息。“非但”跟“不但”是有差别，“不但”的作用仅在于预示后续句的语义递进信息；两者在句法分布和语用功能等方面呈不对称性。“非但”在汉语史上经历了由无标记项向有标记项的转变，后起的“不但”则是无标记项。
|
| 关 键 词： | “非但” “不但” 反预期 语用功能 标记 |
On the Pragmatic Functions of "Feidan" and "Budan" in Chinese Language |
| |
| HU Bin-bin.On the Pragmatic Functions of "Feidan" and "Budan" in Chinese Language[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Humanities & Social Science),2010(4):123-130. |
| |
| Authors: | HU Bin-bin |
| |
| Institution: | HU Bin-bin (College of Chinese Culture, Huaqiao Univ. , Quanzhou, 362021, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The paper is intended to analyse the pragmatic functions of word ＂feidan＇i in contemporary Chinese with the information theory and markers theory. It points out the main function of ＂feidan＂ is to mark the counter-anticipated information of the advance minor sentence, and to indicate the counter-anticipated semantic progressive information of the following minor sentence as welt, so it is a counter-anticipated concurrently counter-anticipated semantic progressive information mark word. The paper also compares the usage of the words ＂feidan＂ and ＂budan＂. It points out the function of ＂budan＂ is only to indicate the following sentence＇s semantic progressive information. The pragmatic function of these two words is different. They are asymmetrical in syntax distribution and function. ＂Fendan＂ has transformed from unmarked item to marked item in modem Chinese, while ＂budan＂ is an unmarked item. |
| |
| Keywords: | feidan budan counter-anticipate pragmatic function markedness |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
