National Curriculum for Physical Education in the United States |
| |
| Authors: | Junghwan Oh Kim C Graber |
| |
| Institution: | Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois |
| |
| Abstract: | Since the publication of A Nation at Risk, some scholars have argued that a national curriculum and national testing are necessary to hold school personnel accountable for student achievement and, ultimately, to raise educational standards. The idea of developing a nationwide curriculum has been widely debated in the United States, where the traditions of local control and state responsibility are dominant. Thus, this article examines the relevance and feasibility of a uniform curriculum in physical education. A core curriculum for physical education has the potential to provide clear goals, coherent instructional guidelines, and relevant assessments aligned with designated program outcomes. A more advanced curricula framework with clear guidance for P-12 curricula and pedagogical practices could promote system-wide changes in school-based physical education. In contrast, the adoption of an overly rigid national curriculum would create a stifling educational context where cultural differences and local flexibility are not allowed. |
| |
| Keywords: | Curriculum reform national curriculum national standards physical education |
|
|
