| 自然"爆破"历史:从本雅明到阿多诺 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈胜云.自然"爆破"历史:从本雅明到阿多诺[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,40(2):14-18. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈胜云 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海行政学院,哲学研究所,上海,200233 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 德国学本雅明主张打破当下的历史连续性，重新揭示历史的内在意义，但由于他没有真正回到现实历史的内在性，所以，受到了法兰克福学派代表人物之一阿多诺的批判。阿多诺继承了本雅明对恶的历史连续性所展开的批判，但放弃了本雅明的理论天真，回到了人类有史以来所面对的真实自然，于是，自然成了历史救赎的现实中介。但是，自然作为中介，只有在摆脱了人本主义历史观之后，才会对历史的救赎产生现实的意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 自然 历史 本雅明 阿多诺 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-6597(2004)02-0014-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年1月15日 |
NATURE "BLOWING UP" HISTORY: FROM BENJAMIN TO ADORNO |
| |
| CHEN Sheng-yun.NATURE "BLOWING UP" HISTORY: FROM BENJAMIN TO ADORNO[J].Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosphy and Social Science Edition),2004,40(2):14-18. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Sheng-yun |
| |
| Abstract: | Walter Benjamin advocated breaking up the historical continuity and then rediscovering the latent significance of history. But as he did not return in the real sense to the internality of the realistic history,he was criticized by Theodor W. Adorno,one of the representatives of the Frankfurt School. Adorno carried on Benjamin's critique of the continuity of the evil history,but put away his theoretical innocence and returned to the real nature which man has faced since the beginning of history. Thus nature becomes the realistic medium of historical atonement. However,only when humanistic conception of history is abandoned,can nature as a medium be of realistic significance for historical atonement. |
| |
| Keywords: | nature history Benjamin Adorno |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
