| 对民事诉讼中"证明责任倒置"的质疑 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王勇.对民事诉讼中"证明责任倒置"的质疑[J].保山师专学报,2006,25(3):86-89. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王勇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南司法警官职业学院,河南,郑州,450011 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "证明责任倒置"被理论界、实务界广泛地使用,但其理论本身难以自圆其说,它与证明责任的基本分配规则相悖,引起证明责任分配标准的混乱,应抛弃"证明责任倒置"的提法,证明责任是由实体法或者程序法按照每一案件事实构成的法律要件不同,事先进行分配的,主要有两种情况,原告一方承担证明责任;原告、被告都承担部分证明责任,被告所承担的证明责任是法律分配的,是正置,不是倒置.
|
| 关 键 词： | 证明责任 分配规则 证明责任倒置 质疑 民事诉讼 责任倒置 正置 法律要件 情况 分配标准 事实构成 案件 程序法 实体法 分配规则 证明责任 使用 实务界 理论 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-6587（2006）03-086-004 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-03-20 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年3月20日 |
Doubt about Conversion of Testifying Responsibilities |
| |
| Wang Yong.Doubt about Conversion of Testifying Responsibilities[J].Journal of Baoshan Teachers' College,2006,25(3):86-89. |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Yong |
| |
| Institution: | Henan Vocational College of judicial Police, ZhengZhou Henan 450011 |
| |
| Abstract: | The concept of testifying responsibilities has been widely used both in theory and practice,but it doesn't hold water.Opposite to the basic distribution standards of testifying responsibilities,it should be abandoned.According to important legal condition of different law cases,testifying responsibilities are two key points that are pre-distributed by substantive laws or procedural laws.In testifying responsibilities: one is t the plaintiff and the defendant that bear the responsibilities respectively.The responsibilities the defendant bear are distributed by laws and can not be converted. |
| |
| Keywords: | testifying responsibilities distribution rules conversion of testifying responsibilities doubt |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
