Special educational needs and art and design education: plural perspectives on exclusion |
| |
| Authors: | Claire Penketh |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Disability and Education, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, UKpenketc@hope.ac.uk |
| |
| Abstract: | AbstractEducation policy proposals by the UK Coalition government appeared to be based on a process of consultation, participation and representation. However, policy formation seems to prioritise and confirm particular ways of knowing and being in the world. This article recognises the ontological and epistemological invalidation at work in education policy by examining the shared context for policy formation in special educational needs (SEN/D) and art and design education. There is value in recognising plurality, acknowledging the ways in which apparently singular policies relating to special education are understood through subject or disciplinary perspectives. The neoliberal aim to foster an economically productive ‘subject’ is evident in policy formation relating to art and design education as well as SEN/D. Both subjects, the disabled child and art and design education, are defined as excessive and are excluded where they do not conform to particular notions of productivity. The article explores theoretical frameworks that are essential for recognising meaning in education when subjects cannot be put to work. |
| |
| Keywords: | Special education art and design education disability studies ableism neoliberalism cripistemology |
|
|
