首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

关于解释学美学和语言学美学的对话
引用本文:王峰,杨梓露.关于解释学美学和语言学美学的对话[J].廊坊师范学院学报,2013(5):5-10.
作者姓名:王峰  杨梓露
作者单位:华东师范大学中文系,上海200241
摘    要:美学必须经受语言分析的洗礼方能浴火重生,后期维特根斯坦思想所提供的语言分析方法是美学得以更新自身的契机,只有将美学研究彻底奠基于语言分析上,才能完成美学中的“语言转向”.相比较而言,伽达默尔的解释学方法对主体论美学的批判虽然有力,但从理路上还存在不彻底之处.因此,转向后期维特根斯坦的语言分析所开辟的美学语法道路是必然之理;由解释学美学“拐”入语言学美学实乃学术思考的自然之果.

关 键 词:解释学美学  语言学美学  语言转向  维特根斯坦  伽达默尔

A Dialogue about Hermeneutic Aesthetics and Linguistic Aesthetics
WANG Feng,YANG Zi-lu.A Dialogue about Hermeneutic Aesthetics and Linguistic Aesthetics[J].Journal of Langfang Teachers College,2013(5):5-10.
Authors:WANG Feng  YANG Zi-lu
Institution:(Department of Chinese Language and Literature, East-China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)
Abstract:Aesthetics must be subjected to linguistic analysis to revive. The analytical method of late Wittgenstein provides an oppor tunity for the revival. Only on the basis of linguistic analysis can linguistic turn of Aesthetics be finished. In comparison, although Gadamer's Hermeneutic method strongly criticized subjective aesthetics, it remains incomplete in theory. Therefore, the way of aes thetic grammar by late Wittgenstein' s linguistic analysis is inevitable. The turn from Hermeneutic aesthetics to linguistic aesthetics is a natural result of academic thinking.
Keywords:Hermeneutic aesthetics  linguistic aesthetics  linguistic turn  Wittgenstein  Gadamer
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号