| 科学民主化问题的哲学基础 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 尚智丛,章雁超.科学民主化问题的哲学基础[J].科学技术哲学研究,2020,37(3):104-109. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 尚智丛 章雁超 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院大学人文学院,北京100049;中国科学院大学人文学院,北京100049 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 现代科学革命引发了科学认识论对科学绝对客观性的质疑。假设性科学实在不能从根本上支持实用主义、符合论与融贯论的三种真理观。经验主义三种方法论蕴含的相对主义倾向使逻辑主义科学哲学对科学的合理性重构陷入困境,从而表明自然界无法对人类获取的科学知识之真伪做出单边裁决。由于范式转换缺乏相应的标准与方法,最终只能诉诸科学共同体的集体意志做出民主抉择。科学知识社会学研究对科学的实践过程再现表明,科学知识的建构过程实际上也是科学实践主体与其他相关主体之间磋商求同的民主过程。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科学民主化 客观性 相对主义 哲学基础 |
A Philosophical Review of the Democratization of Science |
| |
| SHANG Zhi-cong,ZHANG Yan-chao.A Philosophical Review of the Democratization of Science[J].Science Technology and Dialectics,2020,37(3):104-109. |
| |
| Authors: | SHANG Zhi-cong ZHANG Yan-chao |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Humanities,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The modern scientific revolution has raised the challenge of scientific epistemology to the absolute objectivity of science.Hypothetical scientific entity cannot ultimately support the three views of truth of pragmatism,correspondence theory and coherentism.The relativism tendency contained in the three methodology of empiricism makes the reconstruction of scientific rationality by logicist philosophy of science into a dilemma,which indicates that nature cannot make a unilateral judgment on the authenticity of scientific knowledge acquired by human beings.Due to the lack of corresponding standards and methods for paradigm shift,we can only resort to the collective will of the scientific community to make democratic choices.SSK has manifested that the process of scientific knowledge construction shows that the process of the construction of scientific knowledge is actually the democratic process of consultation between the subject of scientific practice and other relevant subjects. |
| |
| Keywords: | democratization of science objectivity relativism philosophical foundation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
