| 从高被引与零被引论文的引文结构差异看Research Front与Research Frontier的区别 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 钟镇.从高被引与零被引论文的引文结构差异看Research Front与Research Frontier的区别[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(8):87-96. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 钟镇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南工业大学管理学院 郑州 450001 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文系国家自然科学基金项目"论文零被引的时间演化规律、影响因素及其应用研究"(项目编号:71373252)和ISTIC-ELSEVIER期刊评价研究中心开放基金资助项目"基于多源叙词索引资源的复合引文分析与科技评价方法研究"(项目编号:2013BS008)研究成果之一。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的/意义]借助引文分析与其他文献计量学研究方法对特定领域的"研究前沿"进行分析,是目前情报学研究的重要课题。但是中文"研究前沿"实际对应于Research Front与Research Frontier两个具有不同内涵的英文术语,厘清这两个术语关系有助于学者改进并正确应用"研究前沿"分析方法。方法/过程]在分析Research Frontier与Research Front两个概念交集关系模型的基础上,以Scientometrics和JASIST两种期刊为样本,检验了常见Research Front引文分析指标的可靠性。结果/结论]实证研究结果显示,尽管高被引论文比零被引在引文的新颖性、热点性、耦合关联性上具有相对显著的优势,但这些特征指标并不能高效地映射潜在的高被引论文。因此,Research Front与Research Frontier是具有显著差异的不同概念,学者们应该对这两组概念进行更为深入的讨论。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文献耦合 共被引 零被引 高被引 网络中心性 引文衰变 引文质量 |
| 收稿时间： | 2015-02-05 |
The Difference Between Research Front and Research Frontier Based on the Reference Structure Difference Between Highly Cited Papers and Un-cited Papers |
| |
| Zhong Zhen.The Difference Between Research Front and Research Frontier Based on the Reference Structure Difference Between Highly Cited Papers and Un-cited Papers[J].Library and Information Service,2015,59(8):87-96. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhong Zhen |
| |
| Institution: | School of Management, He'nan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001 |
| |
| Abstract: | Purpose/significance]The Research Front(s) studies based on citation analysis and visualization methods were one of most important topics in informetrics.However, Research Front and Research Frontier are different terms, which translated into same Chinese Word. It is valuable to modify or apply these methods, that make distinction between the two concepts.Method/process]Starting from the intersection relationship between Research Front and Research Frontier, the paper tested the reliability of citation analysis methods in Research Front, based on the comparison of reference structure difference between highly cited papers and un-cited papers which were from Scientometrics and JASIST.Result/conclusion]The results showed that, though there were newer, hotter and closer relationship references in highly cited papers, nearly all general reference indicators could not efficiently identify the highly cited paper in future. Based on the results, this paper emphasized the reliability of testing and adaptive boundary condition of Research Front methods, and discussed the effect of the citation window selection in citation analysis. |
| |
| Keywords: | bibliographic coupling co-citation un-cited papers highly cited papers network centrality reference aging reference quality |
|
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文 |
