| 中国社会学的实证主义道路能走多远 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 叶南客,王向伟.中国社会学的实证主义道路能走多远[J].金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版),2012,26(1):1-5. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 叶南客 王向伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 南京市社科院,江苏南京,210018
2. 南京师范大学社会发展学院,江苏南京,210046 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 社会学自1839年产生以来,实证主义与反实证主义的交锋一直不断,可以说,社会学170余年的发展历史,就是实证与反实证一路争论的历史。中国社会学继承了西方社会学实证主义的本质特性,以定量的方法为主,专注于社会实证调查,实证主义是中国社会学的主流。但同时,同西方社会学的发展历程一样,中国社会学内部也存在着实证与反实证、定量研究与定性分析的二元分歧,尤其西方社会学在20世纪60年代中期陷入＂社会学危机＂的争论以来,中国社会学实证与反实证、定量与定性方法的争论更加激烈,随之产生了中国社会学的实证主义道路能走多远的疑问。针对这一问题,应从社会学的学科特点和当前中国的转型实际予以正确分析和回答。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中国社会学 实证主义道路 定量研究 |
Assessment of the Development of Chinese Sociological Positivism |
| |
| YE Nan-ke,WANG Xiang-wei.Assessment of the Development of Chinese Sociological Positivism[J].Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology :Social Science Edition,2012,26(1):1-5. |
| |
| Authors: | YE Nan-ke WANG Xiang-wei |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Nanjing Academy of Social Sciences,Nanjing 210018,China;2.Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210046,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Since 1839,the debate between positivism sociology and anti-positivism sociology has started.We can say that the 170-year development of sociology is the history of argument between them.Chinese sociology has inherited the positivist characteristics of western sociology.Positivism is the mainstream of Chinese sociology and focuses on empirical investigation.But at the same time,like western sociology,there are also the dual differences between the empirical sociology and anti-empirical,quantitative research and qualitative analysis in the development of Chinese sociology.Especially in the mid 1960s,since the argument of "western sociology crisis",the debate has become more heated;resulting in how far Chinese positive sociology can go.In order to solve this problem,we should provide a correct analysis and solution from the perspective of the special feature of sociology and the current reality of China’s transition. |
| |
| Keywords: | Chinese sociology positivism road quantitative research |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
