| 盗窃罪之立法技术分析——以两个加重情节为切入点 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐启明.盗窃罪之立法技术分析——以两个加重情节为切入点[J].辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2009,32(5):27-32. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐启明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 吉林大学,法学院,吉林,长春,130012 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以"盗窃金融机构"和"盗窃珍贵文物"为切入点,对盗窃罪的行为模式和法定刑进行分析,发现<刑法>和<最高人民法院关于审理盗窃案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释>对于行为模式、加重情节、法定刑设定的认识极为混乱和不科学,从而造成了盗窃金融机构和珍贵文物行为的构成性地位不明,加重情节规定层次混乱,法定刑设定依据与幅度失当等问题,而造成这些混乱的根本原因就在于科学的立法技术的缺失.
|
| 关 键 词： | 盗窃罪 立法技术 加重情节 法定刑 |
An Analysis of the Legislative Technology Against Theft--Using Two Aggravating Circumstances as a Breakthrough |
| |
| XU Qi-ming.An Analysis of the Legislative Technology Against Theft--Using Two Aggravating Circumstances as a Breakthrough[J].Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition),2009,32(5):27-32. |
| |
| Authors: | XU Qi-ming |
| |
| Institution: | School of Law;Jilin University;Changchun 130012;China |
| |
| Abstract: | Through analysing the behaviour patterns and sentence of theft offence using "theft of financial institutions" and " theft of precious relics" as a breakthrough we find that The Criminal Law and Explanation have a confusing and unscientific understanding of behaviour patterns,aggravating circumstances and the setting of sentence,which causes the unclear status of the behaviour construction of the theft of financial institutions and theft of precious relics,the disordered regulating levels of the aggravating... |
| |
| Keywords: | theft legislative technology aggrvating circumstances sentence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
