首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

医疗侵权赔偿刍议
引用本文:周玉文,姜福廷.医疗侵权赔偿刍议[J].玉溪师范学院学报,2005,21(7):29-31.
作者姓名:周玉文  姜福廷
作者单位:南平师范高等专科学校 福建武夷山354300 (周玉文),南平师范高等专科学校 福建武夷山354300(姜福廷)
摘    要:医疗机构医疗过错的认定包括主观过错的认定和客观过错的认定。而《医疗事故处理条例》第33条所规定的6种情形,既是医疗机构用以证明自己的医疗行为不属于医疗事故的途径;同时也是医疗机构用以证明自己在医疗活动中患者的损害与其医疗行为没有因果关系的途径。对于那些与患者损害有因果关系的医疗过错的赔偿额度,则可用没有责任、25%轻度责任、50%次要责任、75%主要责任、100%的完全责任等5个级别来给予确认。

关 键 词:医疗过错  因果关系  赔偿额度
文章编号:1009-9506(2005)07-0029-03
修稿时间:2005年6月3日

On Reparative Responsibility of Medical Tort
ZHOU Yu-wenJIANG Fu-ting.On Reparative Responsibility of Medical Tort[J].Journal of Yuxi Teachers' College,2005,21(7):29-31.
Authors:ZHOU Yu-wenJIANG Fu-ting
Abstract:The identification of medical negligence by a medical organ includes the identification of the subjective and objective faults. The 33rd article of Regulation on Handling Medical Service Accident defines six cases, to which the medical organ resorts to prove that a medical action is not a medical accident or that the harm to a patient is not the consequence of a medical action. For the cases in which the harm is caused by a medical action, the identification of the medical organ's reparative responsibility falls into five degrees: no responsibility, 25% light responsibility, 50% secondary responsibility, 75% primary responsibility and 100% complete responsibility.
Keywords:medical fault  causality  sum of compensation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号