| 理性语言批判——对“美是什么”的反思 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周全田.理性语言批判——对“美是什么”的反思[J].周口师范学院学报,2001,18(6):40-43. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周全田 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 周口师范高等专科学校中文系,河南周口466000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 人类理性语言是呈“递阶秩序”的结构,所谓最高概念都是假定的,是在无可奈何的情况下制定的。如果我们一定要用一种肯定的方式来回答,那就只能是绝对无或者“真空”。而所谓“中介性”概念,我们通常的解释和定义,其实都是近似值。所谓“是”或者“有”其实都是“不全是”或者“不全有”。表语永远无法和主语相符合或者相一致。此外,“这是什么”“那是什么”乃是一种“不知之问”,而像“美是什么”“艺术是什么”等问法,其实是“明知故问”。柏拉图的“美是什么”的命题,其答案就是“美本身”,而几千年来,与其说这种提问是一种误导,还不如说是后人对他的误解。
|
| 关 键 词： | 柏拉图 理式 美 最高概念 中介概念 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-6730(2001)06-0040-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000年12月21 |
The Criticism of Rational Language --The Thought about what Is the Beauty |
| |
| ZHOU,Quan-tian.The Criticism of Rational Language --The Thought about what Is the Beauty[J].Journal of Zhoukou Normal University,2001,18(6):40-43. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Quan-tian |
| |
| Abstract: | The writer think that the man Rational language is the configuration like stairs. so-called the highest conception is all assumed, and it is draw up under the conditions without away . If we must answer in a affirmative way, it doesn't exist or it is vacuum. So-called "the middle conception", our common explanation and definition are all similar in fact. So-called"being" or "having" is "not completely being" or "not completely having". Predicative is not the same as subject for ever, or similar. Besides this the writer yet think: "what is this". "What is that" is a kind of "asking what he doesn't know", but the asking about "what is the Beauty"? "What is the Art" is "asking what he knows" . The proposition about "what is the Beauty" of Plato, the key is beauty itself, but several millenary later, rather than say this kind of formulation is wrong, I prefer to say it is the descendants misread about it. |
| |
| Keywords: | Plato iogos beauty the highest conception the middle conception |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
