| 批评语与言语行为转喻 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 解桂秋,史宝辉.批评语与言语行为转喻[J].语文学刊：高等教育版,2008(6):60-62. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 解桂秋 史宝辉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京林业大学外语学院,北京100083 |
| |
| 摘 要： | Thornburg＆Panther提出的言语行为转喻（简称为SAM）理论融合了言语行为理论和转喻理论两方面的内容，认为言语行为同其他日常行为一样可以被分解为若干个阶段，而这些阶段构成言语行为脚本（acfion scenario）。在交际中，每一个阶段都可以激活整个脚本并指代整个行为。本文则试图以该理论为基础来分析转喻思维涉及“批评”类语言所在各个阶段的语用解释力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 批评 言语行为转喻理论 行为脚本 |
Critical Comments and the Speech Act Metonymy |
| |
| XIE Guiqiu,SHI Baohui.Critical Comments and the Speech Act Metonymy[J].Journal of Language and Literature,2008(6):60-62. |
| |
| Authors: | XIE Guiqiu SHI Baohui |
| |
| Institution: | ( School of Foreign Languages, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China 100083) |
| |
| Abstract: | The Speech Act Metonymy （ SAM） Theory proposed by Thornburg ＆ Panther combines both the Speech Act Theory and the Metonymy Study. It holds that speech acts are just the same as other acts in our daily life and they can also be divided into several phases which form kinds of action scenarios on the whole. During the communication process, every phase can motivate the whole scenario and carry out speech acts involved in it. This paper attempts to con- strue the cognitive and pragmatic motivation of metonymy as well as its pragmatic forces on the basis of the critical com- ments using. |
| |
| Keywords: | critical comments SAM Theory action scenario |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
