| 欧美教育政策研究与学科发展及其与中国的比较分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘水云,刘复兴,徐赘.欧美教育政策研究与学科发展及其与中国的比较分析[J].学科教育,2014(3):62-68. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘水云 刘复兴 徐赘 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京师范大学教育学部,北京100875 |
| |
| 基金项目： | ：本文系教育部哲学社会科学研究重大委托项目“中国特色社会主义教育发展道路研究”（项目编号：12JZDW004）成果之一. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对于教育政策的研究，欧美国家与中国在研究主题上具有明显的相似性，但研究关注点上略有差异，这与所在国家和地区教育改革与发展的阶段和背景有关。同时，研究的视角和范式上也存在较大的差异，西方的教育政策研究更加微观，重视经验性的实证研究，而中国的研究更宏观，重视思辨性的规范研究，特别缺乏经验研究基础上的理论建构。相应的，在学科建设和人才培养上也有很大的不同，西方更重视学科建设的跨学科性和人才培养的应用性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 教育政策 研究主题 研究范式 规范研究 实证研究 学科发展 |
A Comparative Analysis of Education Policy Research and Subject Development in Europe and North America and China |
| |
| Institution: | LIU Shui-yun, LIU Fu-xing, XU Yun (Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The education policy research in Europe and North America is similar to that in China in re- search themes. However, they have slightly different research focus, which is linked with the educational reforms and development in their own national contexts. Meanwhile, their research perspectives and para- digms are obviously different. The western education policy research tends to be at a micro level and em- phasizes empirical studies; while the research in China is standard research emphasizing philosophical anal- ysis at macro level and lacks evidence-based theoretical construction. Consistently, there is also a big gap between the West and China in terms of subject development and student training. The interdisciplinarity of subject development and the practice-orientation of student training are more emphasized in the West. |
| |
| Keywords: | education policy research theme research paradigm empirical studies philosophical a-nalysis subject development |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
