首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

一个"劳而无功"的虚假性命题--评"教育理论与实践关系"之争
引用本文:高伟.一个"劳而无功"的虚假性命题--评"教育理论与实践关系"之争[J].北京大学教育评论,2005,3(2):59-64.
作者姓名:高伟
作者单位:山东师范大学,教育科学学院,济南,250014
摘    要:教育理论与实践之争是一个“劳而无功”的虚假性命题。教育领域教育理论与实践关系之争只是重复了哲学的工作,而没有真正意识到这场讨论的根本意义所在。教育理论与实践关系的讨论,其本质是一种基于理论与实践承担主体的价值诉求和价值期望的辩护方式。因而根本的问题不在于其关系究竟如何,而是教育理论与实践究竟应该“何为”。

关 键 词:教育理论  教育实践

A FRUITLESSLY FALSE PROPOSITION: A CRITICISM ON THE DEBATE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEORY AND PRACTICE IN EDUCATION
Gao Wei.A FRUITLESSLY FALSE PROPOSITION: A CRITICISM ON THE DEBATE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEORY AND PRACTICE IN EDUCATION[J].Peking University Education Review,2005,3(2):59-64.
Authors:Gao Wei
Abstract:This article argues that the debate on the relationship between theory and practice in education is a fruitlessly false proposition, which just repeats the work of philosophy but isn't conscious of the real meaning of this debate. The essence of the debate is a justification for the value plea and value expectation of those who take on the work of theory building and actual practice. Therefore, the essential issue is not what the real relationship between theory and practice is, but what the purposes of theory and practice are in education.
Keywords:educational theory  educational practice  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京大学教育评论》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京大学教育评论》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号