首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

羁押“必要性”之认定问题研究
引用本文:张元元.羁押“必要性”之认定问题研究[J].丽水学院学报,2014(1):60-66.
作者姓名:张元元
作者单位:中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088
摘    要:新《刑事诉讼法》第93条设立了逮捕后的羁押必要性审查制度,新的《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》第616至621条对这一制度进行了细化,赋予了其可操作性.认定是否具有羁押的“必要性”,应当遵守尊重和保障人权原则、变更性原则、比例性原则和全面性原则.具体操作时,首先需要确定审查的主体,然后认定审查的内容,进而从证明责任分配、审查的方式、审查的效力、与《刑事诉讼法》相关条文的关系几个方面来综合认定是否具有羁押的“必要性”.

关 键 词:羁押必要性  审查原则  审查主体  审查内容

Research on Identifying Necessity of Custody
ZHANG Yuanyuan.Research on Identifying Necessity of Custody[J].Journal of Lishui University,2014(1):60-66.
Authors:ZHANG Yuanyuan
Institution:ZHANG Yuanyuan( College of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088 )
Abstract:The principle of reviewing the necessity of custody after arrest has been established in the 93rd item of the Criminal Procedural Law newly enacted. The principle has been specified in detail from 616 to 621 item of the Rules of the Supreme People's Procuratorate newly promulgated and made practically operable. While be determined first, the content for the review should d then be recognized, and the necessity of custody should finally be identified from the following perspectives such as the distribution of the responsib means of reviewing, effectiveness of reviewing and the relationship with relevant items of Procedural Law.
Keywords:the necessity of custody  principle of reviewing  subject for review  content for review lity of proof  the Criminal
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号