首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“信都国,景帝二年为广川国”诸问题之再探讨——兼与王文涛先生商榷
引用本文:邓海成,刘玉山,赵光明.“信都国,景帝二年为广川国”诸问题之再探讨——兼与王文涛先生商榷[J].咸阳师范学院学报,2010,25(1):25-27.
作者姓名:邓海成  刘玉山  赵光明
作者单位:1. 内江师范学院政法与历史学院,四川内江,641000
2. 厦门大学台湾研究院,福建厦门,361000
摘    要:对班固与颜师古所处时代及立场加以综合分析,并通过对“广川国”沿革的准确爬梳,得出《汉书·地理志》中关于“景帝二年为广川国”的论断无疑是正确的,而后半句“宣帝甘露三年复故”实应为“甘露四年”。

关 键 词:信都国  汉景帝  广川国  探讨

Further Discussions on Various Problems Concerning "the State of Xindu was Styled the State of Guangchuan in the Second Year of Emperor Jing"——Doubled as a consultation with Mr.Wang Wentao
DENG Hai-cheng,LIU Yu-shan,ZHAO Guang-ming.Further Discussions on Various Problems Concerning "the State of Xindu was Styled the State of Guangchuan in the Second Year of Emperor Jing"——Doubled as a consultation with Mr.Wang Wentao[J].Journal of Xianyang Normal University,2010,25(1):25-27.
Authors:DENG Hai-cheng  LIU Yu-shan  ZHAO Guang-ming
Institution:DENG Hai-cheng1,LIU Yu-shan2,ZHAO Guang-ming1(1.School of Politics,Law , History,Neijiang Normal University,Neijiang,Sichuan 641000,2.Taiwan Research Institute,Xiamen University,Xiamen,Fujian 361000.China)
Abstract:A comprehensive analysis is made of the times and standpoints of Ban Gu and Yan Shigu.Through the exact clarifications of the origin of the state of Guangchuan,it is concluded that the statement of being styled the state of Guangchuan in the second year of Emperor Jingis unquestionably correct,whereas the latter half of the sentence being styled its original name in the third year of Emperor Xuan should have been in the fourth year of Emperor Xuan.
Keywords:the state of Xindu  Emperor Jing of Han Dynasty  the state of Guangchuan  discussions  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号