首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

图书馆、博物馆和档案馆评估比较研究
引用本文:马双双,吴建华.图书馆、博物馆和档案馆评估比较研究[J].档案与建设,2019(2):4-8,13.
作者姓名:马双双  吴建华
作者单位:南京大学信息管理学院,江苏南京,210023;南京大学信息管理学院,江苏南京,210023
摘    要:基于图书馆、博物馆、档案馆评估对比研究的必要性和可行性分析,文章论述了始于20世纪80年代中期的图书馆评估工作,其形成了评估制度的常规化、评估过程的自动化、评估主体的多样化等评估特色。而兴起于21世纪初的博物馆评估具有评估流程的现代化、评估结果的共享化、运行评估的常态化等特色。借鉴两者的工作经验,我国的档案馆评估工作可从评估主体的多样化、评估管理的现代化、评估结果的共享化、评估机制的制度化和常态化等方面加以参考。

关 键 词:图书馆  博物馆  档案馆  评估  比较研究

A Comparative Study on Libraries,Museums and Archives Evaluation
Ma Shuangshuang,Wu Jianhua.A Comparative Study on Libraries,Museums and Archives Evaluation[J].Archives and Construction,2019(2):4-8,13.
Authors:Ma Shuangshuang  Wu Jianhua
Institution:(School of Information Management of Nanjing University,Nanjing,Jiangsu,210023)
Abstract:Based on the analysis of the necessity and feasibility of comparative study of library,Museum and archives evaluation,this paper discusses the library evaluation works which began in the mid-1980s,and it has formed the evaluation characteristics of institutionalization,automation and diversification of evaluation subjects.Museum evaluation,which emerged in the early 21st century,has the characteristics of modernization of evaluation process,sharing of evaluation results and normalization of operation evaluation.Referring to the experience of both,the evaluation of archives in China can be referred from the aspects of diversification of evaluation subjects,modernization of evaluation management,sharing of evaluation results,institutionalization and normalization of evaluation mechanism.
Keywords:Library  Museum  Archives  Evaluation  Comparative Study
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号