首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

重新理解理论与实践的关系
引用本文:徐长福.重新理解理论与实践的关系[J].教学与研究,2005(5):30-41.
作者姓名:徐长福
作者单位:中山大学,马克思主义哲学与中国现代化研究所,广东,广州,510275
摘    要:本文介绍了作者对理论与实践关系的一些研究心得。作者一直追问这样一个问题:在人文社会领域,一流的理论为什么往往导出失败的实践? 在《理论思维与工程思维》一书中,作者认为,其原因在于理论思维和工程思维的相互僭越:用理论思维设计工程蓝图,用工程思维建构理论体系,致使工程蓝图不可实施,理论体系缺乏效力。近年来,作者将此问题放入西方哲学史中加以考量,初步辨识出了问题的缘起与线索,确认要害在于being和实践的关系。已有的解决being问题的路径有二:一是依逻辑求本质,二是靠显现开存在。应当还有一条路:通过整合异质性因素来成就实践。理论与实践的关系或许能由此得到全新的理解。

关 键 词:理论  实践  本质  存在
文章编号:0257-2826(2005)05-0030-12
修稿时间:2005年2月20日

New Insights on Relationship between Theory and Practice
XU Chang-fu.New Insights on Relationship between Theory and Practice[J].Teaching and Research,2005(5):30-41.
Authors:XU Chang-fu
Abstract:That is, why first-class theories in humanities and social sciences often fail to bring the intended results when put to practice? The author has analyzed the situation in his work Theoretical Thinking and Project Thinking, and reasoned that the crucial point was the contradictions between the two thinking patterns. The author observes that the design of a project is usually in the theoretical thinking pattern, while the establishment of the theory is often in the project thinking pattern, resulting in impossibility of realizing the project plan and unsatisfactory validity of the theories.The author holds that the critical point is the relationship between the being and the practice. There are two existing approaches to the problem of being. One is to refer to the essence of logic, the other is to reveal its existence. There can be a third way: to readjust and integrate the heterogeneous aspects in practice.
Keywords:theory  practice  essence  being  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号