| 社会契约论三种——对霍布斯、洛克与卢梭政治哲学思想的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王平.社会契约论三种——对霍布斯、洛克与卢梭政治哲学思想的比较[J].安徽教育学院学报,2007,25(5):6-10. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 苏州大学,政治与公共管理学院,江苏,苏州,215006 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 作为近代西方社会契约论的代表人物,霍布斯主张订立社会契约的要义是维护秩序与安全,洛克主张构建社会契约的重心是保护人的自然权利,卢梭则坚决信奉人民主权原则。霍布斯与洛克的社会契约理论虽存在极大差异,但二者却有着共同的政治哲学基础:消极自由观。与之相反,卢梭的社会契约理论奠基在积极自由观之上。
|
| 关 键 词： | 社会契约论 消极自由观 积极自由观 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-5116（2007）05-0006-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 2007-08-01 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-08-01 |
Three Kinds of Social Contract Theory——A Comparative Study on Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's Political Philosophy |
| |
| WANG Ping.Three Kinds of Social Contract Theory——A Comparative Study on Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau''''s Political Philosophy[J].Journal of Anhui Institute of Education,2007,25(5):6-10. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Ping |
| |
| Institution: | School of Political and Public Administration, Suzhou University, Suzhou 215123, China |
| |
| Abstract: | As representative figures of modern western social contract theory,Hobbes advocated that the essence of social contract is to maintain order and security;Locke thought that the focus of building a social contract is to protect human's natural rights,and Rousseau firmly believes in the sovereignty principle.Though Hobbes and Locke's social contract theories differ greatly,both share a common political philosophical base: negative freedom.In contrast,Rousseau's social contract theory is based on a positive concept of freedom. |
| |
| Keywords: | social contract negative view of freedom positive view of freedom |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
