| 国际体育纠纷调解机制比较探究——以美国、英国和CAS为主要视角 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 石俭平.国际体育纠纷调解机制比较探究——以美国、英国和CAS为主要视角[J].体育科研,2013(6):23-28. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 石俭平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海政法学院 体育法学研究中心 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 调解作为一种替代性纠纷解决机制,所具有的特点和优势契合了国际体育纠纷解决的方向,逐渐受到世界各国的青睐.美国、英国国内的体育仲裁机构以及国际体育仲裁院在调解机制的规则和运用上各具特点,相互借鉴、相互竞争,整体代表了体育调解机制的未来发展趋势,但在调解模式、纠纷范围、调解员的中立和保密要求方面仍存在不断完善的空间.
|
| 关 键 词： | 体育纠纷 调解 国际体育仲裁院 美国仲裁协会 英国体育纠纷解决委员会 |
Comparison between the mediation mechanisms for International sports disputes: from the angles of USA, UK and CAS |
| |
| Shi Jianping.Comparison between the mediation mechanisms for International sports disputes: from the angles of USA, UK and CAS[J].Sports Science Research,2013(6):23-28. |
| |
| Authors: | Shi Jianping |
| |
| Institution: | Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Sport Law Research Center |
| |
| Abstract: | The characteristics and advantages of mediation, which is an alternative dispute-solving mechanism, coincide with the direction of solving international sports disputes. Mediation has gradually gained popularity in the world. CAS and the sports arbitration institutions in the US and UK have their own characteristics in applying the rules of mediation mechanism. They learn from each other and compete with each other. And they represent the future development tendency of sports arbitration mechanism. Yet in the aspects of mediation model, dispute scope, neutrality of mediators and secrecy requirements , there is still room for perfection. |
| |
| Keywords: | sports dispute mediation CAS American Arbitration Association British Sports Dispute Resolution Committee |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《体育科研》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《体育科研》下载免费的PDF全文 |
