首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

土司制度的封建割据性特征:面相与论评
引用本文:蓝武.土司制度的封建割据性特征:面相与论评[J].楚雄师专学报,2013(10):87-91,100.
作者姓名:蓝武
作者单位:广西师范大学,广西桂林541001
基金项目:2012年度国家社科基金重大项目“中国土司制度史料编纂整理与研究”,批准号:12&ZD135;2008年度国家社会科学基金项目“华南边陲传统民族社会的国家认同--以壮族土司制度为实证”,项目编号:08XMZ015;2011年度“全国高等院校古籍整理研究工作委员会直接资助项目”--“《白山司志》点校及其文献学研究”,批准编号:1120.
摘    要:土司制度是与封建大一统制度迥然有别的特殊的地域统治制度,具有明显的封建割据性特征。土司制度的封建割据性,早于其原起的羁縻制度时代即已凸显出来,随着社会历史的发展而愈加浓烈。造成土司制度封建割据性的主要原因,当缘于地方土司与封建中央王朝在行政制度上的相异性特点及由此造成的地方土司割据形势。

关 键 词:土司制度  封建割据性  民族问题

The Characteristics of Feudal Separation in Chieftain System
LAN Wu.The Characteristics of Feudal Separation in Chieftain System[J].Journal of Chuxiong Normal University,2013(10):87-91,100.
Authors:LAN Wu
Institution:LAN Wu ( Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541001, China)
Abstract:Tusi (Chieftain) system was a special system of regional domination different from feudal unified system and it has feudal separation characteristics obviously. This feature stood out before the era of Jimi system (a system of local administrators in minority areas) and became more intense with the development of social history. The feature of feudal separation Tusi (Chieftain) system was caused by the differences of administrative system between the local Tusi (Chieftain) and the feudal central government and the following division situation. Bureaucratization of native officers was the inevitable result of historical development.
Keywords:Tusi (Chieftain) system  feudal separation  ethnic issues
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号