| 法律与道德：行政权力研究的双重视角 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王阳亮.法律与道德：行政权力研究的双重视角[J].未来与发展,2016(3):5-9. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王阳亮 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南开大学周恩来政府管理学院,天津,300071 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法律与道德是规约行政权力的制度形式。从法律与道德两个维度研究行政权力运行的不同类型，可以渐次分为严格受法律控制的行政行为、同时受法律控制和道德调节的行政行为和没有具体法律条文规定的情形中主要受到道德规范的行政行为。在上述三种情境中，行政权力运行的规约在一定情况下只遵循合法原则，但在权力的飞地则表现为在一定的法治精神基础上遵循道德原则。法律对行政权力运行的规约作用体现在规范和惩罚；道德对行政权力规约的作用体现在规范、激励和惩罚。基于不同情境中制度的效用不同，结合中国现实制度安排的特点分析规约行政权力的现实路径。
|
| 关 键 词： | 行政权力 正式制度 非正式制度 |
Law and Morality:Dual Perspective of Research on Administrative Power |
| |
| Abstract: | Law and morality are institutional forms to restrict administrative power. From the above two dimensions, execution of administrative power can be gradually divided into three kinds of situations, strict legal control, legal-moral mixed control and administrative ethics control with no specific legal provisions. In certain circumstances, administrative power only follows the principle of law. However, in the enclave of power, administrative power also has to follow certain ethical principles on the basis of rule of the law. As to administrative power, legal restrictions are on the role of norms and punishment; the role of executive moral embodied in norms, incentives and penalties. Combined with China's institutional arrangements, this paper analysis the benefits of law and morality in those three different situations and discuss the institutional path to power restriction. |
| |
| Keywords: | Administrative power formal system informal system |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
