| 中国附带民事诉讼“同案不同判”问题的成因探析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈建新.中国附带民事诉讼“同案不同判”问题的成因探析[J].六盘水师范高等专科学校学报,2010,22(2):50-54. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈建新 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中共怀化市委党校,湖南,怀化,418008 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 同一个附带民事诉讼案件事实，因审理法院和审判程序的影响而得到不伺判决结果的“同案不同判”现象，在中国的附带民事诉讼中出现的比例较高。究其产生的原因，认为有四个方面：一是确定赔偿范围的基本原则把握不准：二是精神损害赔偿请求被无理排除；三是物质损失赔偿范围被任意压缩；四是公诉机关在附带民事诉讼中不作为。
|
| 关 键 词： | 附带民事诉讼 同案不同判 损害赔偿 成因 |
The Analysis of the Reason Why the Same Case Has Different Judgments in Chinese Supplementary Civil Action in Criminal Proceedings |
| |
| CHEN Jian-xin.The Analysis of the Reason Why the Same Case Has Different Judgments in Chinese Supplementary Civil Action in Criminal Proceedings[J].Journal of Liupanshui Teachers College,2010,22(2):50-54. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Jian-xin |
| |
| Institution: | CHEN Jian-xin (The Communist Party Municipal Party Committee Party School ;Huaihua 418000 , China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The appearance of the phenomenon that the same case supplementary civil action in criminal proceedings results in different judgments because of the effects of laweourt and the process of adjudgment has high proportion in Chinese supplementary civil action in criminal proceedings, the writer thinks that the reasons that the phenomenon has happened are the following five points： Firstly, the basic principles to decide the range of atonement are not determined truly. Secondly, the requirement for the atonement of mental impairment is excluded with reasonable reason. Thirdly, the range of atonement of material expense is reduced randomly. Fourthly, the departments of public prosecution do not carry out their duty in supplementary civil action in criminal proceedings.. |
| |
| Keywords: | supplementary civil action in criminal proceedings the same case resulted in different judgments compensation for damage the reason |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
