| 比较与批判:生理学与方法学视野下的分期与板块训练理论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 崔东霞,李钊.比较与批判:生理学与方法学视野下的分期与板块训练理论[J].上海体育学院学报,2012,36(4):72-75. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 崔东霞 李钊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 郑州大学体育系,河南郑州,450001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 运动训练的安排问题一直是分期理论与板块理论争论的焦点。分期理论的支持者认为,此理论具有广泛的经验性、科学—实验性和理论—方法性基础,当今的运动训练仍要坚持分期理论的训练原则与原理;板块理论的支持者认为,在高级运动员全年要参加多次比赛的背景下,应在短时间内通过集中负荷效应发展专项能力。运用文献资料法、比较分析法,从生理学与方法学层面对分期理论与板块理论进行探讨。认为:分期训练理论符合人体超量恢复原理,建立在马克思主义哲学与系统论的方法学基础上;板块训练理论与集中负荷长期延迟效应存在矛盾,运动训练安排存在片面性与孤立性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 分期理论 板块理论 生理学 方法学 运动训练 |
Comparison and Criticism: Periodization and Block Training Theory in the Horizons of Physiology and Methodology |
| |
| CUI Dong-xia
,
LI Zhao.Comparison and Criticism: Periodization and Block Training Theory in the Horizons of Physiology and Methodology[J].Journal of Shanghai Physical Education Institute,2012,36(4):72-75. |
| |
| Authors: | CUI Dong-xia LI Zhao |
| |
| Institution: | Department of Physical Education,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,Henan,China |
| |
| Abstract: | The arrangement of physical training is always the dispute of periodization theory and block theory.Supporters of the former theory think it has a history of decades,with a broad empirical,scientific-experimental and theoretical basis,while the latter supporters think high-level athletes who participate in several competitions every year will concentrate on special ability through load effect in a short time.The study uses the methods of literature review and comparative analysis to explore the theory of periodization and block from physiology and methodology.It indicates that the periodization training theory,based on Marx philosophy and system theory,accords with human body excess resume principle;whereas block training theory has contradiction with long-term effect,so the arrangement of sport training is one-sided and isolated. |
| |
| Keywords: | periodization theory block theory physiology methodology physical training |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
