| 《春秋繁露·三代改制质文》真伪考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 江新.《春秋繁露·三代改制质文》真伪考[J].信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(1):126-129. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 江新 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学哲学系 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《春秋繁露·三代改制质文》篇一直以来被认为是研究董仲舒历史哲学最为重要的文献。但是,此文篇首以刘歆《世经》的五德相生顺序排列五帝,篇中的"四法说"与董仲舒对策及其他有关董仲舒的文献相矛盾,篇末的"圣人预言说"出自纬书。这些都说明此文不可能出自董仲舒之手,而是两汉之季的公羊后学发挥公羊先师董仲舒的"春秋改制说",综合在此之前流行的"三统论"、"五德终始论"、"文质论"等历史哲学理论混合而成的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 董仲舒 《春秋繁露·三代改制质文》 真伪 |
Authenticity of the Articles "The Three Dynasties Changed Regulations from Basic to Refined" in "Chunqiu fanlu" |
| |
| JIANG Xin.Authenticity of the Articles "The Three Dynasties Changed Regulations from Basic to Refined" in "Chunqiu fanlu"[J].Journal of Xinyang Teachers College(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2012(1):126-129. |
| |
| Authors: | JIANG Xin |
| |
| Institution: | JIANG Xin(Philosophy Department,Peking University,Beijing100871,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The article "The three dynasties changed regulations from basic to refined" in "Chunqiu fanlu" had long been considered the most important literature about historical philosophy of DONG Zhongshu.However,in this article,the Five Emperors were arranged in the order of Five Force like"Shijing";the "Four Rules" conflict with DONG’s Response to the Emperor Wu;"Prognostic of the Future Emperor " is similar with apocryphal texts.These argue that the article was not written by DONG Zhong-shu.The article was written by the Gongyang disciple after DONG Zhong-shu,who elaborated DONG Zhong-shu’s Theory,and synthesized "Three Standars Theory","The theory about Cycle of Five Force ","The theory about Basic and Refined "and so on. |
| |
| Keywords: | DONG Zhong-shu the three dynasties changed regulations authenticity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
