A TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS OF THE DRUG ISSUE, 1985-1990: THE PRESS, THE PRESIDENT AND PUBLIC OPINIO |
| |
| Authors: | Gonzenbach William J |
| |
| Institution: | William J. Gonzenbach has a PhD in mass communication research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is an assistant professor in the College of Communication at the University of Alabama. His research interests center on the dynamics of public opinion processes and the relationship of public relations to opinion formation. |
| |
| Abstract: | This study examines the triangular relationship of the press,the president and public opinion about the drug issue in theUnited States from 1985 to 1990. Agenda-setting theory servesas the theoretical foundation for the ARIMA time-series analysis,which attempts to address who is driving the public opinionformation process about drugs: the press, the president, orthe public. The study employs a unique method in that ‘mostimportant problem’ survey results from nine organizationsare quilted into a time-series of 70 monthly points to measurethe public agenda. The press agenda is based on a computerizedcontent analysis of the frequency of coverage of the drug issue,and the presidential agenda is based on a similar analysis ofthe presidents’ public relations agendas. The three univariatetime-series are identified, estimated, and diagnosed. Then thewhite-noise component of each is used in a cross-correlationanalysis to address the research question. The results indicatethat public opinion mirrors or immediately follows the press,though public opinion also drives the press agenda. Second,the study suggests that the president is following the publicagenda, though the president also has strong immediate influenceon public opinion. And, finally it suggests the president mirrorsand follows the media, in addition to following public opinion.The trend of opinion, when viewed in relation to the historyof events surrounding the issue, suggests that the public opinionformation process, as measured through the lens of public opinionpolls, may be a matter of public perceptions of the realityof the issue and of the pseudo-realities of information campaignsand presidential and press attention, which may have their originsback in the heart of the public concern. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录！ |
|
