| 共同犯罪理论中若干争议问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马克昌.共同犯罪理论中若干争议问题[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,18(1):16-23,34. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马克昌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 一、关于片面共犯，存在否定说和肯定说之争；肯定说中，对肯定的范围，意见也不一致，比较起来，以片面有形帮助犯说为可取。二、我国刑法学界关于共同犯罪人的分类，意见也有分歧。笔者认为，宜分为两类：即以分工为标准分为组织犯、实行犯、帮助犯、教唆犯，以作用为标准分为主犯、从犯、胁从犯，不过第一类中只有教唆犯是法定的共同犯罪人的一种。三、教唆犯是否具独立性和从属性的两重性，亦有肯定说与否定说之争。笔者主张应根据我国刑法的规定论述教唆犯的性质。认为我国刑法规定的教唆犯，确实具有两重性，但独立性是主要的。据此．对反对意见逐一予以适当的回答。
|
| 关 键 词： | 共同犯罪 片面共犯 教唆犯 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-7023(2004)01-0016-08 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年12月5日 |
Controversial Issues on the Theory of Joint Crime |
| |
| MA Ke-chang.Controversial Issues on the Theory of Joint Crime[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition),2004,18(1):16-23,34. |
| |
| Authors: | MA Ke-chang |
| |
| Abstract: | Firstly, there are two doctrines on the single-way joint crime (positivism and negativism) in theory, among positivism; there are several different arguments, too. It is proper to adopt visible aid single-way joint crime argument. Secondly, there are also different opinions on the classification of joint crime, one is divided into organizer, committer, abider and instigator from division in joint crime, the other is divided into principle criminal, accomplice, and coerced criminal from function in joint crime. However, only instigator is written in criminal code in the first classification. Thirdly, there are different opinions on the double natures of instigator (positivism and negativism), it should be discussed within the stipulation of criminal law, hence instigator in China does have double natures (independent nature and dependent nature), and independent nature is the main nature. The article gives proper answers to arguments from negativism. |
| |
| Keywords: | joint crime single-way joint crime instigator |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
