首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国证人出庭制度的理论反思
引用本文:戴婧婧.我国证人出庭制度的理论反思[J].丽水学院学报,2014(3):42-46.
作者姓名:戴婧婧
作者单位:中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088
摘    要:我国的证人出庭制度似乎变成了证人不出庭制度:被告人认罪的案件实行简化审理,证人很少出庭;即使在普通程序中,法律也不要求所有证人一律出庭。对于仅剩的需要证人出庭的案件,却存在着无法强制证人作证的问题:由于律师无法对尚不存在的证人证言提出异议,启动法院强制证人出庭的权力变得不切实际;而特定近亲属享有免于出庭作证的特权,法院无法强制其出庭。需要肯定证人出庭制度的价值,并在此基础上实行机制改革,赋予被告人审前充分的质证机会、扩大适用认罪案件程序、将证言分为尚未取得和已经取得两种情形以及将特定近亲属的免于出庭作证特权改为拒绝作证特权。

关 键 词:证人出庭  强制出庭  机制改革

Theoretical Reflection on Chinese Witness Attendance System
DAI Jingjing.Theoretical Reflection on Chinese Witness Attendance System[J].Journal of Lishui University,2014(3):42-46.
Authors:DAI Jingjing
Institution:DAI Jingjing (Sehool of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law, 100088, Beijing)
Abstract:Chinese witness attendance system seems to be witness non-attendance system: cases in which the defendant pleads guilty are tried simply with witnesses rarely attending the court; even in ordinary procedure, the law does not require all witnesses to attend the court. To those cases where witness attendance is necessary,some witnesses can not be compelled to attend the court due to the following reasons: on the one hand,it is impractical for the court to compel the witness to attend the court since the attorney can not challenge non-existing testimony;on the other,certain close relatives enjoy the privilege of not attending the court. It is necessary first to confirm the value of witness attendance system and then reform the system: the defendant shaould be given the prior opportunity to cross-examine;procedures applicable to cases where the defendant pleads guilty should get expanded; two types of testimonies——the ones that have been made and the ones have not been made should be differentiated; the relative nonattendance privilege should be replaced by the privilege of not testifying.
Keywords:witness attendance  compulsory attendance  system reform
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号