| 培根式归纳及其争论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宋伟.培根式归纳及其争论[J].科学技术与辩证法,2011(3):42-46. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宋伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖北大学哲学学院/道德与文明研究中心; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 湖北大学青年项目“穆勒《论精神科学的逻辑》研究”(100-098211) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 培根式归纳作为一种科学方法通常被认为具有如下特点：1．以大量经验事实为基础；2．渐进式获得普遍性逐步上升的结论；3．“忽视”观念、猜想或假说的作用。针对培根式归纳的这些特点，穆勒、耶芳斯和波普尔等人对其进行了批评，而惠威尔、内尔和莱欣巴赫等人则为之进行了辩护。讨论这一争论目的在于更为清楚地认识培根式归纳的特征、作用和局限。
|
| 关 键 词： | 培根 归纳 争论 |
Baconian Induction and Disputes over It |
| |
| SONG Wei.Baconian Induction and Disputes over It[J].Science Technology and Dialectics,2011(3):42-46. |
| |
| Authors: | SONG Wei |
| |
| Institution: | SONG Wei(Faculty of philosophy,Studying Cemter of Morals and Civilization,Hubei University,Wuhan 430062,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | As a scientific method,Baconian induction is usually regarded as possessing such characteristics as follows: 1.it is based on a great deal of experiential facts;2.it arrives at more and more generalized conclusions in a gradual bottom-to-up way;3.it neglects the function of ideas,conjectures or hypotheses.For these,many writers such as Mill,Jevons and Popper have criticized Baconian induction,but others such as Whewell,Neil and Reichenbach have given corresponding arguments against the criticism.Discussing ... |
| |
| Keywords: | Bacon induction disputes |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
