| 浅议现有技术抗辩中的抵角申请 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄敏.浅议现有技术抗辩中的抵角申请[J].中国专利与商标,2008(3):73-76. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄敏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 原国家知识产权局正部级审查员 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 抵触申请是专利法中的重要概念，其不仅应用於专利审查程序中，在专利侵权诉讼中，运用抵触申请进行抗辩也具有十分重要的意义。对於抵触申请在相关程序中的作用的话题也引起了一些学者的关注与争鸣，如张荣彦先生的“也谈现有技术抗辩的认定”（以下称“也谈”）、张晓都先生的“再谈现有技术抗辩的认定标准与现有技术抗辩的抵触申请”（以下称“再谈”）等，这些讨论对於如何正确运用现有技术抗辩是非常有益的。在此，笔者针对两文中所涉及的问题，也作一些粗浅的探讨。
|
| 关 键 词： | 技术 审查程序 专利法 侵权诉讼 认定标准 |
Brief Review of Conflicting Application in Prior-art Defence |
| |
| Authors: | Huang Min |
| |
| Institution: | Huang Min(Former senior Examiner of the State Intellectual Property Office) |
| |
| Abstract: | The conflicting application, an important concept in the patent law, is applicable in the patent examination proceedings. Making defence with or on the basis of a conflicting application is of great significance in patent infringement litigation. The role of the conflicting application has drawn attention from, and given rise to debates among, scholars as is shown in such articles as the Reexamination of Prior Art Defence Determination （the Reexamination for short） by Mr. Zhang Rongyan and the Reconsideration of Prior Art Defence Determination Standards and Conflicting Application in Prior Art Defence （the Reconsideration for short） by Mr. Zhang Xiaodu. Their discussion or examination is useful in terms of how to make proper use of the prior art defence. This writer will present a brief review of the issues touched upon in the two articles. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
