首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论题系沙上建塔,铁证乃谬误堆成——答吴直雄先生并与其《习凿齿及其相关问题再考辨》一文商榷
引用本文:叶植.论题系沙上建塔,铁证乃谬误堆成——答吴直雄先生并与其《习凿齿及其相关问题再考辨》一文商榷[J].襄樊学院学报,2011,32(12):13-23.
作者姓名:叶植
作者单位:襄樊学院襄阳及三国历史文化研究所,湖北襄阳,441053
摘    要:族谱大凡远溯名人为始祖或始迁祖又无确凿旁证支持的基本都属造伪,《白梅习氏族谱》中关于习凿齿的记载也属于此。吴直雄先生以《白梅习氏族谱》、子虚乌有的《大元大一统志》记载、1500年前袁州《郡志》所载习凿齿隐居江西的资料为依据,考证出习凿齿晚年隐居新余白梅,这一结论是错误的。吴直雄先生将《汉晋春秋》和《襄阳耆旧记》的完成时间、地点、内容及习凿齿的生卒年等全部弄错了。

关 键 词:习凿齿  新余习氏  《白梅习氏族谱》  《汉晋春秋》  《襄阳耆旧记》

Consulting Wu Zhixiong on One More Textual Research on Xi Zuochi and Some Related Problems
YE Zhi.Consulting Wu Zhixiong on One More Textual Research on Xi Zuochi and Some Related Problems[J].Journal of Xiangfan University,2011,32(12):13-23.
Authors:YE Zhi
Institution:YE Zhi(Institute of Xiangyang and Three Kingdoms’ History & Culture,Xiangfan University,Xiangyang 441053,China)
Abstract:Pedigree of a clan without surporting evidences, in which a famous person was regarded as the first ancestor, is generally fake. Therefor the records on Xi Zuochi in The Pedigree of Xi Family in Baimei are unrea- sonable. Based on The Pedigree of Xi Family in Baimei, unreal Da Yuan Dayitong Zhi, Jun Zhi by Yuan Zhou 1500 years ago, Wu Zhixiong holds that Xi Zuochi lived in seclusion in Baimei, Xinyu in the last days of his life. However this conclusion is wrong. Moreover, the time, the site and the content of Hai Jin Chunqiu and Xiangyang Qijiu Ji are wrong, including Xi Zuochi' s birth time and death time.
Keywords:Xi Zuochi  Xi Family in Xinyu  The Pedigree of Xi Family in Baimei  Hai Jin Chunqiu  Xiangyang Qijiu Ji
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号