| 德日刑法学中的财产罪保护法益问题之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘明祥.德日刑法学中的财产罪保护法益问题之比较[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2000,14(1):38-42. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘明祥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学,法学院法律系,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 财产罪侵害何种法益是以德日为代表的大陆法系国家刑法理论上早有争议的问题。在德国有法律的财产说、经济的财产说和法律的经济的财产说之争，在日本则有本权说、占有说及各种修正说之论。争论的实质在于：是扩大、缩小、还是适当限制财产罪的处罚范围。从马克思主义关于犯罪本质的学说而论，财产罪的本质是侵犯财产所有权，似乎本权说更为可取；刑法的廉谦抑性原则也要求对财产罪的处罚范围加以限制，采取本权说更符合刑法的精神。但对传统的本权说应该作适当的修正。
|
| 关 键 词： | 财产罪 法益 所有权 占有说 德国 日本 刑法 本权说 修正说 财产 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-3889(2000)01-0038-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 1999年11月1日 |
Protection of Legal Interest in Property Crime in German and Japanese Criminal Law: A Comparative Approach |
| |
| LIU Ming,xiang.Protection of Legal Interest in Property Crime in German and Japanese Criminal Law: A Comparative Approach[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition),2000,14(1):38-42. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Ming xiang |
| |
| Abstract: | It is a long argued issue concerning what legal interest the property crimes inflict in the criminal law theories of continental legal system countries, represented by Germany and Japan. In Germany, debates center on legal property theory, economic property theory and legal and economic property theory. While in Japan, arguments are right in essence, right of possession and various revisionist theories. It seems the nature of the debate lies in the choice between expanding, reducing, or properly confining the scope of property crime punishment. From the perspective of Marxist theory on the nature of crime,the substance of property crime is to violate the proprietary right, thus right in essence theory seems to be more applausible. Moreover, the restrictive principle of criminal law also requires limiting the punishment scope of property crime, in this sense, right of essence theory accords with spirits of criminal law. It should be noted that conventional right of essence theory needs some appropriate adjustment. |
| |
| Keywords: | property crime legal interest proprietary right possession |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
