| 新国家理论述评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杨光斌.新国家理论述评[J].教学与研究,2004(7):64-69. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杨光斌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学,国际关系学院,北京,100872 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 20世纪80年代以来,政治学理论的一个重大发展是在最为传统的国家理论方面。从国家和社会关系出发,吉登斯提出了新的国家类型即传统主义国家、绝对主义国家和现代民族国家;新制度主义的代表人物诺思以国家目的悖论理论有力地解释了第一批现代化国家的得与失;而20世纪70-80年代很多国家的政治变迁则使亨廷顿等人总结出国家转型理论。本文结合中国和其他主要国家的现代化进程,验证这些国家理论的解释力与限度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 国家类型 国家目的 国家转型 |
| 文章编号： | 0257-2826(2004)07-0064-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年3月18日 |
On New Theories of States |
| |
| YANG Guang-bin.On New Theories of States[J].Teaching and Research,2004(7):64-69. |
| |
| Authors: | YANG Guang-bin |
| |
| Abstract: | An important achievement in political science since 1980s has been found in the most traditional theory of state. In view of the state-society relation, Giddens proposed that the new types of states included the traditional state, the absolutist states, and the nation-state. North, the representative of neo-institutionalism, explained loss and gains of the first modern states with theory of dilemma of state intentions. Huntington, on the other hand, summarized theory of state transition in the light of the political changes of many states during the 1970s and 1980s. This paper attempts to testify the validity and reliability of these theories based on evidence from the process of modernization of China and other major powers. |
| |
| Keywords: | type of state purpose of state transition of state |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
