首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

段、顾之争的若干问题及乾嘉时期校勘理论的发展
引用本文:王记录.段、顾之争的若干问题及乾嘉时期校勘理论的发展[J].商丘师范学院学报,2011,27(11):39-43.
作者姓名:王记录
作者单位:河南师范大学社会发展学院,河南新乡,453007
摘    要:乾嘉时期,段玉裁和顾广圻在文献校勘问题上产生了一场影响很大的争论,顾广圻主张“不校校之”,段玉裁主张“定底本之是非与定立说之是非”。关于这场争论,后世或是段而非顾,或是顾而非段;或认为是吴、皖两派校勘家的门户之争,或认为是对校、理校的校勘方法之争。实际上,段、顾之争只是方法论上的不同,并没有对立性的分歧,不能断然当成是吴、皖两派校勘家之间的对立。段玉裁“定底本之是非”的原则顾广圻也在用,顾广圻“不校校之”的理论段玉裁也是认同的。段、顾之争直接推动了清代校勘学理论的发展,卢文招的“两通者但注其下”的原则,王引之的“三改三不改”论,都是这场争论的产物。

关 键 词:段玉裁  顾广圻  校勘  乾嘉时期

On the Issues of the Document Collation between Duan Yucai and Gu Guangqi and the Theoretical Development of the Publications Amendment during Qianlong and Jiaqing Period
WANG Jilu.On the Issues of the Document Collation between Duan Yucai and Gu Guangqi and the Theoretical Development of the Publications Amendment during Qianlong and Jiaqing Period[J].Journal of Shangqiu Teachers College,2011,27(11):39-43.
Authors:WANG Jilu
Institution:WANG Jilu(College of Social Science,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang,Henan 453007,China)
Abstract:During the times of Qianlong and Jiaqing in Qing Dynasty, there had been a hot dispute between Duan Yucai and Gu Guangqi over the issue of document collation. Gu Guangqi held that "the proper collation is to sticking to the original edition", whereas Duan Yucai maintained that "form and content should be distinguished and collated in different ways". The latter scholars are either for Duan' s view but against Gu' s, or vise versa. In fact, their views of the two scholars are not completely contradictory in essence. The only difference lies in the methodology itself. In practice, Duan' s principle was employed by Gu, and Gu' s theory was accepted by Duan as well. The dispute between Duan and Gu had contributed a lot to the development of collation theory in Qing Dynasty.
Keywords:Duan yucai  Gu Guangqi  document collation  the times of Qianlong and Jiaqing
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号