| “信息不存在”行政诉讼之证明责任分配研究--兼评《政府信息公开条例》第36条 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 胡萍.“信息不存在”行政诉讼之证明责任分配研究--兼评《政府信息公开条例》第36条[J].潍坊教育学院学报,2020(1):76-81,90. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 胡萍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.中央财经大学法学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 关于如何配置信息不存在行政诉讼中的证明责任,2019年的《政府信息公开条例》仅致力于技术性策略应对,具有局限性。欲破解此类诉讼中的证明责任配置困境,亟需回归理论共识,相较于"分层次说","规范说"更适合被引入到我国行政诉讼司法实践。将以实体法规范为基础的"规范说"作为理论支撑,加之对司法实践案件的归纳,在"双阶层"证明对象的基础上分别配置证明责任更为适宜。
|
| 关 键 词： | 信息不存在 证明责任 规范说 “双阶层”证明对象 |
Distribution of Burden of Proof in Administrative Litigation of Information Non-existent |
| |
| HU Ping.Distribution of Burden of Proof in Administrative Litigation of Information Non-existent[J].Journal of Weifang Educational College,2020(1):76-81,90. |
| |
| Authors: | HU Ping |
| |
| Institution: | (Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100089) |
| |
| Abstract: | As to how to allocate the burden of proof in administrative litigation of information non-existent,the Government Information Disclosure Ordinance in 2019 is only a technical strategy with limitations. To deal with this dilemma,we need to return to the theoretical consensus. Compared with hierarchical theory,normative theory is more suitable to be introduced into the judicial practice of administrative litigation in China. It is more appropriate to allocate the burden of proof separately on the basis of the double stratum,in accordance with normative theory as theoretical support and judicial practice cases. |
| |
| Keywords: | information non-existent burden of proof normative theory the object of proof of double stratum |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
