| 当代经验知识的核心之辩 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郑辉军.当代经验知识的核心之辩[J].科学技术与辩证法,2014(4):28-32. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郑辉军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 厦门大学哲学系知识论与认知科学研究中心,福建厦门361005 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金青年项目“形式知识论研究”（13czx052） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 经验知识是否具有可信赖的基础？它构成了哲学家论辩的一个基本问题域。基础主义者的回答是肯定的并集中反映在“给予论”这一理论中。但自从塞拉斯提出“给予神话”以来，哲学家开始重新审视经验知识的基础。当代一些重要的哲学家，如戴维森、麦克道威尔等都卷入其中。通过比较这些哲学家对“给予神话”不同论述可知论辩的焦点所在，即指向一个核心问题：经验内容与概念的关系。有些学者认为概念已经以不同方式进入经验内容，而反对者则认为在给予中存在非概念的经验内容作为知识的基础。对此问题的回应，最具影响的是康德的论述。通过回到康德，可进一步厘清当代经验知识基础的论战的关键所在。
|
| 关 键 词： | 给予神话 感觉内容 概念 康德 |
The Core in Contemporary Debate About Empirical Knowledge |
| |
| Institution: | ZHENG Hui -jun ( The Center of Epistemology and Cognitive Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen Fujian 361005, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | It has formed a basic domain of discussion whether or not empirical knowledge has a reliable foundation. However, since Sellars presented the myth of the given, some distinguished philosophers, such as Donald Davidson, and John McDowell, have re - investigated the empirical foundation of knowledge. What they are mainly concerned is the relationship between empirical contents and conceptions. Some scholars hold that concepts permeate the em- pirical contents, but opponents claim that there are non -conceptual empirical contents in the given as the basis of knowledge. The most influential response to this is Kant＇ s expounding, which helps us understand the essence of contemporary debates about the basis of empirical knowledge. |
| |
| Keywords: | myth of the given sensation concept Kant |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
