| 20世纪中国史学的论争与发展 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 欧阳跃峰.20世纪中国史学的论争与发展[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,33(2):189-197. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 欧阳跃峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽师范大学,社会学院,安徽,芜湖,241000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 安徽省教育厅社科基金项目(2003JW081) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 20世纪中国史学伴随着新与旧、善与恶、真理与谬误、进步与反动的论争,完成了由传统向现代的转化。建国前的半个世纪,资产阶级"新史学"取代封建传统史学,马克思主义史学形成并走向成熟;建国后至"文革"爆发的17年,马克思主义史学占据统治地位并一度走向简单化、教条化;"文革"结束至世纪末的20余年,中国史学在反思中复苏,逐步走向繁荣。
|
| 关 键 词： | 史学 论争 发展 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-2435(2005)02-0189-09 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年1月12日 |
Controversy and development of Chinese historiography in the 20th century |
| |
| OU-YANG Yue-feng.Controversy and development of Chinese historiography in the 20th century[J].Journal of Anhui Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2005,33(2):189-197. |
| |
| Authors: | OU-YANG Yue-feng |
| |
| Abstract: | Chinese historiography, accompanying the controversy between the new against the old, the good against the bad, truth against falsehood and progress against reaction, accomplished a change from traditional to modern in the 20th century. In the 20th century before the founding of People's Republic of China, bourgeois "new historical science" replaced feudal traditional historiography, and Marxist historiography formed and matured. From the founding of the People's Republic of China to the eruption of the Great Cultural Revolution, Marxist historiography occupied a dominant position and once moved towards oversimplify and doctrinarian. From the end of the Great Cultural Revolution to the end of the 20th century, Chinese historiography resuscitated as it self-questioned, advanced step by step towards prosperity. |
| |
| Keywords: | historical science controversy development |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
