| STS科学民主化争论的还原与分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 白惠仁.STS科学民主化争论的还原与分析[J].科学学研究,2016,33(8):1121-1130. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 白惠仁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院大学人文学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 柯林斯和埃文斯的"科学的社会研究的第三波理论"发表后,引起了贾撒诺夫和温尼关于科学民主化问题的激烈反响,科学技术论(STS)研究陷入了关于科学决策的公众参与限度的争论当中。争论双方着重关注于科学本身,未充分认识到民主的地方性,尤其是不同民主理念背后的哲学基础,在民主化方面过于草率地沿袭了现成的民主理念。因此,争论的本质是民主化的理由是什么以及何种民主理念适用于科学的民主化。对这场争论的民主理念和价值承诺的还原,将促进对科学民主化理论基础的理解。
|
| 关 键 词： | STS 科学民主化 民主理念 价值承诺 |
| 收稿时间： | 2015-12-30; |
The reduction and analysis on the debate of democratization of science in the field of STS |
| |
| Abstract: | After the publication of ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies’ by Harry Collins and Robert Evans, Sheila Jasanoff and Brian Wynne both expressed their views on democratization of science of great difference, then the two sides fall into the debate of the limit of participation. The two sides focus on science, but ignored the locality of democracy especially and followed the current democratic ideals without rethinking. Therefore, the essence of the debate lies on which democratic ideal is suitable for democratization of science. Political philosophy analysis will promote the understanding of the theoretical basis of democratization of science. |
| |
| Keywords: | STS democratization of science democratic idea value commitment |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
