首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论“司法强拆”的合法性基础
引用本文:尤乐,郭文东,李静,王琳,逯晓枫.论“司法强拆”的合法性基础[J].嘉应学院学报,2012,30(10):50-55.
作者姓名:尤乐  郭文东  李静  王琳  逯晓枫
作者单位:1. 深圳大学法学院,广东深圳,518060
2. 深圳市宝安区法院,广东深圳,518101
基金项目:2011年广东省高级人民法院重点调研课题
摘    要:"司法强拆"作为行政强制执行方式之一,产生对公民财产权的限制作用。其合法性基础在于:应以法律形式规定法院的司法性执行权,而非行政法规,以符合形式法治的要求;其取得,不能只有《行政诉讼法》和《行政强制法》的一般性规定,而应有财产权限制的专门立法的具体和明确的授权,以符合法律保留原则和实质法治的精神。虽然2011年《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》中有关"司法强拆"的规定的合法性尚可将就,但立法机关应主动进行征收立法,否则"司法强拆"的合法性基础仍然欠缺。

关 键 词:“司法强拆”  财产权限制  形式法治  实质法治  法律保留

On the Legitimacy of Judicial Demolitions
YOU Le,GUO Wen-dong,LI Jing,WANG Lin,LU Xiao-feng.On the Legitimacy of Judicial Demolitions[J].Journal of Jiaying University,2012,30(10):50-55.
Authors:YOU Le  GUO Wen-dong  LI Jing  WANG Lin  LU Xiao-feng
Institution:1.Law School,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,China; 2.Shenzhen Baoan Court,Shenzhen 518101,China)
Abstract:As one of the administrative enforcement modes, judicial compulsory demolition produces the effect of restriction to citizen's property right. Its legitimacy foundation includes : in order to meet the requirements of the form of the rule of law ,judicial execution power should be provided by the form of law, instead of administrative regula- tions;we should formulate not only " administrative procedure law" and" administrative enforcement law ",but also authorize the property right restriction legislation, to comply with the principle of legal reservation and the essence of the spirit of the rule of law. Although the legitimacy of " judicial compulsory demolitions" in the "2011 Housing on the State- owned land levy and Compensation Ordinance" should be strengthned, but the legislature shall also actively carry out the legislation of levy , or" judicial compulsory demolitions" will lack legitimacy foundation.
Keywords:judicial compulsory demolition  limitation of property rights  formal rule of law  substantive rule of law  legal reserve
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号