| 论克里普克的先验偶然命题与后验必然命题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李章吕.论克里普克的先验偶然命题与后验必然命题[J].鸡西大学学报,2008,8(6):35-37. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李章吕 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 重庆师范大学初等教育学院,重庆,400700 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自康德以来，人们，特别是康德主义者和逻辑实证主义者等总以为“先验的”就等同于“必然的”，“后验的”就等同于“偶然的”，也就是说，“先验命题一定是必然命题，后验命题一定是偶然命题”。但是，克里普克却提出了“先验偶然命题”和“后验必然命题”，也就是说，“先验的”并不一定是“必然的”，“后验的”也并不一定是“偶然的”。显然，克里普克的这个理论是与传统经验论观点相矛盾的，是对传统经验论的彻底打破，具有非常深远的历史意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 克里普克 先验性 必然性 先验偶然命题 后验必然命题 |
Chreaps' Prior Accidental Proposition and the Apodictic Proposition |
| |
| Li Zhanglv.Chreaps' Prior Accidental Proposition and the Apodictic Proposition[J].JOurnal of Jixi University:comprehensive Edition,2008,8(6):35-37. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Zhanglv |
| |
| Abstract: | Since Conde, a famous philosopher, people always thinks that there is a identity between the inevitable and accidentally. The prior proposition is certainly taken as the apodictic proposition. Chreap proposed the prior accidental proposition and the apodictic proposition . It is obvious that this theory is contrast to the traditional empiricism. But the theory is a break to the traditional philosophy and it has the extremely profound historical significance. |
| |
| Keywords: | Chreap apriority inevitability prior accidental proposition apodictic proposition |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
