| 谈林权的法律性质 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘宏明.谈林权的法律性质[J].高校教育管理,2007(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘宏明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 国家林业局宣传办公室 北京 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 公权和私权的划分标准较具影响的是利益说、主体说和创设依据说。自然人、法人或者其他组织、国家、集体均可成为林权的主体。不同类型的林权在法律性质上存在差异,有的属于公权,有的属于私权,因此,不能简单地将林权界定为公权或者私权,而应将林权定性为包含公权性质和私权性质不同类型权利的集合体。
|
| 关 键 词： | 林权 公权 私权 |
On Legal Nature of Forest Ownership |
| |
| Liu Hongming.On Legal Nature of Forest Ownership[J].Journal of higher Education Management,2007(2). |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Hongming |
| |
| Institution: | State Forestry Administration |
| |
| Abstract: | Benefit theory, subject theory and basis-creation theory are three influential standards of differentiating public right and private right. All natural person, legal entity, and other organizations, nations and collectives can be the main body of the forest ownership. As far as legal nature is concerned, there are differences between different kinds of ownerships, some belong to public right, some private right. Therefore, forest ownership can not be simply denned as public right or private right while it should be considered as a collection with different rights, containing both public and private right. |
| |
| Keywords: | forest ownership public right private right |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
