Hardness measurement of natural and hybrid turf soccer fields |
| |
| Authors: | Selina Yasemin Thanheiser Sven Grashey-Jansen Georg Armbruster |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Institute of Geography,University of Augsburg,Augsburg,Germany;2.Sachverst?ndigenbüro Armbruster,Stadtbergen,Germany |
| |
| Abstract: | Understanding the surface hardness of soccer fields is essential to evaluate the risk of injury and also its influence on the playing behavior of soccer players. In this context, newly developed hybrid turf systems have to be tested for their surface hardness with regard to the increased risk of injury on hard sports surfaces. The hardness of a soccer field can be quantitatively measured using an apparatus with a cylindrical weight that is dropped from a defined height. Since this procedure was first used for road construction, there are few studies investigating its use on sports grounds. This has led to inconsistencies in methodology and the absence of evaluation guidelines for classifying the hardness of soccer fields. This paper considers how turf systems (natural turf and hybrid turf) differ in their hardness and how this method can be used for different soccer turf systems. Natural turf systems, stitched turf systems, hybrid turf-bearing layer systems and woven mat systems were investigated. The assessment results from a comparative representation of hardness values of different soccer fields. By comparison, natural turf systems were found to be the softest, while woven mat systems were the hardest. Furthermore, the parameters that might affect the hardness were investigated. The influence of the measured soil parameters decreases with an increasing number of measurements per measuring point. Turf system-specific correlations make it possible to reduce the amount of measurement effort. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
