Blurred Boundaries or Conflicting Epistemologies |
| |
| Authors: | Nina Grønlykke Mollerup |
| |
| Institution: | Department of Communication and Arts, Business and Information Technologies (CBIT), University of Roskilde, Denmark. |
| |
| Abstract: | In this article, I discuss how information activists and journalists in Egypt claimed to acquire knowledge about the world, looking particularly at the period of 2012 and 2013, during which the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces and Mohammed Morsi in turn were leading the country. Taking a point of departure in anthropological fieldwork with information activists and journalists in Egypt, I show that information activists and journalists often had very similar practices and goals, which at times made the boundaries very blurry. Yet I argue that there was a significant distinction between the epistemologies of information activists and journalists. Information activists claimed to acquire knowledge about events from being part of them, whereas journalists claimed to acquire knowledge about events from observing them without taking part. Relatedly, information activists and journalists had significantly different relationships with their audiences. |
| |
| Keywords: | Egypt epistemology information activism journalism media media anthropology |
|
|
