| 实践相关性与科学严谨性:论图书馆学理论与实践的脱节 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘宇,谢欢,顾烨青.实践相关性与科学严谨性:论图书馆学理论与实践的脱节[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(24):32-41. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘宇 谢欢 顾烨青 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 上海大学图书情报档案系 上海 200444;
2. 南京大学信息管理学院 南京 210023;
3. 江南大学图书馆 无锡 214122 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的/意义] 理论与实践脱节是应用性学科需要面对的一个普遍问题，分析图书馆学理论与实践脱节的历史渊源和制度逻辑，探索理论与实践结合的新路径。方法/过程] 对理论与实践脱节问题进行了学术史回顾，并采用问卷调查法研究同行对专业期刊的感知差异。结果/结论] 民国时期的图书馆学研究强调实践相关性，形成了图书馆学的经验主义传统；改革开放后的图书馆学研究追求科学严谨性，形成了本质主义范式的图书馆学研究。本质主义范式的兴起导致了图书馆学研究理论与实践脱节问题的逐步显现，图书馆学界内部也分化为实践派和学院派两大阵营，不同阵营倚赖不同的期刊。理论与实践脱节的根源在于学术生产的体制化，学术界和实践界形成了各自不同的运行规则。科学严谨性和实践相关性并非完全对立，通过在图书馆学界推广“巴斯德象限”类型的研究可以有效解决理论与实践脱节的问题。
|
| 关 键 词： | 实践相关性 科学严谨性 图书馆学 理论与实践脱节 巴斯德象限 |
| 收稿时间： | 2016-10-17 |
| 修稿时间： | 2016-12-01 |
The Academic-practitioner Gap in LIS: An Explanation Based on Practical Relevance and Scientific Rigor |
| |
| Liu Yu,Xie Huan,Gu Yeqing.The Academic-practitioner Gap in LIS: An Explanation Based on Practical Relevance and Scientific Rigor[J].Library and Information Service,2016,60(24):32-41. |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Yu Xie Huan Gu Yeqing |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Library, Information & Archives, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444;
2. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023;
3. Jiangnan University Library, Wuxi 214122 |
| |
| Abstract: | Purpose/significance] The academic-practitioner gap is very prevalent in many applied sciences. The paper aims to analyze the historical formation process and institutional root of the gap, and explore a new path for the integration of theory and practice. Method/process] A historical review of the academic-practitioner gap was made. The perception difference of the professional journals was investigated by a survey of librarians and researchers including faculties and graduate students. Result/conclusion] In the period of the Republic of China, the research of library science emphasized the practical relevance, which formed the empiricism tradition. In the era of reform and opening-up, library science research paid great attention to scientific rigor, which formed the essentialism paradigm of library science. As a result, the academic-practitioner gap arose, causing the community to be divided into academia part and practitioner part. The two camps relied on different journals which gave different weight to the balance of scientific rigorousness and practical relevance. The root of the gap between the theoretical camp and the practical camp is the institutionalization of the knowledge production system. The academia and practitioners have formed their own different rules of their own social system. Scientific rigorousness and practical relevance are not completely on the opposite side. The research type called "Pasteur Quadrant" involving scientific rigorousness and practical relevance can effectively solve the problem of the gap in library science. |
| |
| Keywords: | practical relevance scientific rigorousness library science academic-practitioner gap Pasteur Quadrant |
|
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文 |
